November 14, 2002 Fellow Citizens:
At 7 PM on MONDAY, November 18, 2002 (at City Hall), without reaching out to the public, the Hoboken City Council will vote on an amendment to enlarge and redefine the look of the Port Authority Project on Hoboken's southern waterfront.
As Dan Tumpson points out in a letter submitted for publication to the Hoboken Reporter (reprinted below), this 2.3 million square foot redevelopment project will already add 16.3% to property tax bills when the project is fully built.
The Roberts Administration claims that the changes to be voted on Monday will reduce the build on Parcel B (on the waterfront between 2nd and 3rd Streets) from 950,000 square feet to 650,000 square feet.
Annette Illing points out in a letter submitted for publication to the Hoboken Reporter (reprinted below) that this is completely untrue: Parcel B was never scheduled for 950,000 square feet of build, and what's more, the 650,000 square feet which will be approved on Monday is actually an INCREASE in the project size specified in the Redevelopment Ordinance by 100,000 square feet.
We urge you all to come to the meeting on Monday to protest this expansion in the project and the rip-off of your tax dollars. We also ask you to pass this email on to everyone you know. It's their waterfront, too.
Thanks.
Sincerely,
Dan Tumpson and Annette Illing
---------------------------------------------------
Port Authority Redevelopment PILOT Ripoff Adds 16.3% to Taxes
Citizens of Hoboken:
The Roberts Administration recently started a process to designate the Maxwell House site on Hoboken's northern waterfront a "redevelopment zone" as governed by the NJ Redevelopment Law (NJSA 40A:12A-1 et seq.). This law is intended to encourage the redevelopment of "blighted" property by exempting it from property taxes and substituting substantially smaller Payments in Lieu of Tax (PILOTs) made to the municipality.
According to the Hoboken Reporter (10-13-02), "Roberts said that by creating PILOT agreements, the municipality gets a bigger piece of the tax pie and that will benefit Hoboken residents and create an incentive to bring major developers to the city. 'There is no question that the way to proceed in the future is with PILOTs,' said Roberts...' ".
There are two problems with this rosy picture:
(1.) Hoboken's Zoning Law is the public's only protection from dangerous overdevelopment. A redevelopment project is exempt from the Zoning Law. Instead, developers and city officials negotiate the redevelopment zoning behind closed doors, with no public participation or scrutiny, which is then incorporated directly into a redevelopment ordinance and into binding contracts with developers. Redevelopment projects which cause harm to the public, through loss of open space, giveaway of public lands, huge buildings, stress on infrastructure (sewer, water, parking, roads), environmental pollution, and extra traffic, escape the scrutiny and regulation of the zoning process. These projects degrade our environment and lower our quality of life for the benefit of a few developers, and we have no say in the matter.
(2.) The redevelopment designation has been applied to Hoboken's most valuable property, waterfront property, violating the intent of state law and transferring the taxes of redevelopment property owners onto the backs of the other taxpayers.
Ordinarily, property owners pay municipal, county, and school tax. In contrast, redevelopment property owners are exempt from these taxes for up to 25 years, paying only PILOTs to the municipal government. To understand how redevelopment/PILOTs affects Hoboken property taxes, consider one redevelopment project, the Port Authority (PA) project on Hoboken's southern waterfront.
At full build, the PA project will consist of 2.3 million sq.ft., valued at about $300/sq.ft. (This estimate is based on a 1000 sq.ft. condo costing $300,000.) If the PA project paid full taxes at the current rate of 3.26%, its property tax would come to $9.78/sq.ft. Instead, the PA project pays PILOTs of only $2/sq.ft, only 20.5% as much tax as the rest of us!
At full build, the PA project will underpay its taxes by $17,900,000. This underpayment is borne by Hoboken and Hudson County (HC) taxpayers, in the following proportions: 61% (municipal and school tax), or $10,915,000, is paid by Hoboken taxpayers, and 39% (county tax), or $6,979,000, is paid by HC taxpayers. Hoboken pays 14.96%, or $1,044,000, of this HC tax, so the total annual increase in Hoboken property taxes due to the Port Authority project adds up to $11,959,000.
Since Hoboken has a total property value of $2.255 billion, this increase amounts to $5.30 per $1000 of assessed property value, or 16.3% of your total property taxes. That's right! Your property tax would go down by 16.3% if the PA Project paid its fair share of taxes! If you own a $200,000 condo, $1061 of your taxes goes directly to paying PA project taxes!
Now Mayor Roberts wants to turn the Maxwell House site, another prime waterfront property, into a redevelopment zone. If the 1.4 million sq.ft. Maxwell House project currently before the Planning Board were given the same PILOT deal as the PA project, it will underpay its taxes by $7,279,000, adding 9.9% to your property tax bill!
This scam is attractive to city officials because they can arrange PILOT payments to initially exceed full municipal taxation, bringing more money into city coffers without increasing the municipal tax levy, so it seems that municipal taxes are "stabilized" and the tax "problem" is with rising school and county taxes. But in truth much of this "problem" stems from transferring most of the redevelopment tax obligations onto the backs of the rest of the taxpayers.
Instead of promoting this redevelopment/PILOT scam, the Mayor and Council should immediately shut down all redevelopment projects, including the Northwest Redevelopment (which is still largely unbuilt), the expansion of the PA project, and the Maxwell House redevelopment designation (both of which are now before the City Council). These projects not only undermine the zoning law and our quality of life, they are ripping us off!
Sincerely,
Daniel Tumpson
----------------------------------------------------------------
OVERDEVELOPMENT ARRIVES IN SHEEP'S CLOTHES
An amendment to Hoboken's South Waterfront Redevelopment Plan, a city ordinance, was introduced at the November 6 City Council meeting. The Plan governs public open space between Sinatra Park and Erie Lackawanna Plaza as well as construction on the three blocks between 1st and 4th Streets.
The council was informed that it would be voting to reduce the development, by limiting construction on the still vacant, middle block, Block B, to 650,000 gross square feet. However, by carefully sidestepping the reality of what has already been built or is currently under construction, and how this compares to the project's maximum size as stated in the ordinance, everyone at the meeting was completely mislead into thinking that the project was being decreased in size.
In truth, the southern and northern blocks in the project are already covered with buildings. On Block A, between 1st and 2nd Streets, at least 1,100,000 gross square feet of office space is nearly completed. On Block C, 333 River Street, containing about 599,000 gross square feet of residential and 61,357 gross square feet of retail space, is finished and occupied. The total for Blocks A and C is approximately 1,760,367 gross square feet. (I am sure, by the way, that these figures are underestimates; they probably don't include the retail space on Block A and common areas within the structures on both blocks.)
According to the Plan, and utilizing the Plan's definition of gross square feet, the southern waterfront project is supposed to be 2,315,000 gross square feet at a maximum. Thus, at the most, approximately 554,640 gross square feet remain unbuilt.
If the Plan is amended, as proposed, to permit 650,000 gross square feet of development on Block B, the South Waterfront project will exceed its allowable size by approximately 100,000 gross square feet. The not a reduction in project size but an increase beyond the legal limit.
Also, the area dedicated to parking, which is not included in the calculation of the project's gross square footage, would be enlarged by the ordinance change. The maximum number of parking spaces for the hotel would be increased 25%.
Though the city's goals in making these ordinance changes may be laudable, I make no comment on them right now. I'm limiting my comments to the Orwellian charade. The spindoctoring that tells us that taller is smaller. Well, it's not. Smaller, in this case is bigger. This ain't no reduction. It's an increase.
Sincerely,
Annette E. Illing